27 September 2010

more python and peer review

they go together like bread and honey these days.

after a few hours of *bucks and a traffic ticket,  a 2nd referee report, which repeats verbatim much of what was in the initial review, is off.

I am really starting to worry that if I had to follow Hogg's research blog rules then I would have nothing to write about.

The highlight of my day was submitting a bit to our astropython website and doing some brainstorming on ways to increase astropython reader involvement within the confines of the current blog structure. also: what is the best way to accept user contributed code, store it, tag it, share it?

No comments:

Post a Comment